Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
newest
oldest most voted

Rojer
Rojer (@guest_264779)
June 2, 2016 15:24

I have had AA Platinum Select card that I received 50K bonus which got upgraded to Elite., as the 24 month rule applies can I apply for the Executive and benefit from the 60K points?

Ken
Ken (@guest_264787)
June 2, 2016 15:46

Since the Executive card is not the same as the AAdvantage Platinum cards they have no bearing on each other.

Jose
Jose (@guest_264768)
June 2, 2016 14:42

I totally agree with you. This card should be $195 tops… You’re much better off with the Citi Prestige

Ken
Ken (@guest_264749)
June 2, 2016 13:38

The $450 was worth it when they offered the 100k bonus points, but for 60k it’s definitely not worth it unless you were going to buy Admirals Club access anyways. You can get 50k AA points from a Citi AAdvantage card that waives the AF for the first year.

Joey1
Joey1 (@guest_264657)
June 2, 2016 09:56

Agreed $450 is definitely steep. Seems like Citi is trying to copy Amex but doing it subpar…

Gary
Gary (@guest_264913)
June 3, 2016 02:27

Not doing it subpar at all. The citi prestige, in many ways, is superior to the amex platinum. A better comparison would be the aa executive and the Delta reserve, which is pretty similar. Chase has yet to offer a card rivaling the amex platinum and Citi prestige, which is interesting, being as the citi premier, amex prg, and Chase Sapphire preferred are basically all rivaling each other (and with the identical AF after you take the $100 amex airline credit into account). It makes you wonder how profitable the prestige and platinum are.

For the prestige, for example, there is a $250 airline credit (which unlike amex, I’m sure they expect to be utilized fully by the majority of cases holders). Considering that they’re only getting a $200 AF after that for a comprehensive priority pass membership and three rounds of golf, aside from the admiral lounge access, the fourth night free, the global entry benefit (assuming that at $20 a year), and the various other benefits, the card seems to be just breaking even or a loss leader AF wise. They’re obviously banking on high worth individuals utilizing the card heavily. This is certainly true for the platinum, which until recently was known as a status symbol for the wealthy. Chase seems not to be too impressed with this math, being as they aren’t offering a competing product. (Arguably, chase has access to these individuals through their banks and JP Morgan investment products, and the chase palladium could be cited as a weak answer to those clients who may have asked why Chase isn’t offering a platinum alternative, as citi is.) As someone who isn’t exactly too profitable for some of the larger institutions, I can commiserate with Chase not wanting to deal with the lower end crowd that seems to be swallowing up the platinum and prestige as a great deal. Cards like the CSP, which are cheap to operate, are heavily touted to these people, but chase seems reluctant to offer a real travel card, perhaps for good reason. It’s notable that the Ritz Carlton, the closest match to these cards, is offered by JP Morgan. At the end of the day, though, the ritz is a hotel card, with the other benefits thrown in to answer amex and Citi. It’s a rather half-hearted attempt, not a standalone high end travelers card.

P
P (@guest_264423)
June 1, 2016 19:57

That got me so excited. It’s actually $5000 spend. LOL