Subscribe
Notify of
guest

115 Comments
newest
oldest most voted

favo🔗
favo🔗 (@guest_2027375)
March 20, 2025 15:15

Soft pull credit. However they pulled my chex twice as soon as I submitted the application. And I received a denial email saying “unable to finish identification and verification” immediately. I do not understand why they pull chex twice.

Gadget 🕵️‍♂️ Bank Bonus Geek 🔗
March 20, 2025 18:52

It happens. If the inquiries were both on the same day, they will merge after about two days, IME. favo🔗

If they were done by different entities (mailing address of bank/CU is different), or done on different days, you will need to dispute the 2nd inquiry. Be clear that you only applied for one account, and had already received an inquiry from that particular bank/CU on xx day. It SHOULD get removed.

I had three inquiries on 3/18/25 at BMO Bank, and they merged sometime today (3/20).

favo🔗
favo🔗 (@guest_2027546)
March 20, 2025 19:04

Thanks Gadget. Good to know the two inquiries would be merged. I received two OnAlerts emails at the same time, I logged into Chexsystems and saw two inquiries. I submitted a dispute for one of it before seeing your comment after the merge, hopefully the dispute wouldn’t mess up how things naturally go…

Gadget 🕵️‍♂️ Bank Bonus Geek 🔗
March 20, 2025 19:07

Maybe you will luck out and get BOTH removed. 🙂

Karl
Karl (@guest_2029547)
March 23, 2025 18:25

I got rid of one like that on the basis of no permissible purpose because the bank was “unable to verify [my] identity”- i.e., I cannot possibly have authorized the inquiry if it wasn’t me who submitted the application.

It was Midland, and the rep actually suggested I do that when I called for recon.

favo🔗
favo🔗 (@guest_2029757)
March 24, 2025 04:19

That is a good argument! I’ll try that next time.

Eric 🔗
Eric 🔗 (@guest_2029769)
March 24, 2025 05:31

favo🔗,

If you write “I cannot possibly have authorized the inquiry if it wasn’t me who submitted the application.” like Karl suggested, that is a blatant lie!

favo🔗
favo🔗 (@guest_2029804)
March 24, 2025 07:19

I do not think Karl suggested writing “I cannot possibly have authorized the inquiry if it wasn’t me who submitted the application”, he was pointing out a logical flaw in the “unable verify identity” situation

Eric 🔗
Eric 🔗 (@guest_2029814)
March 24, 2025 07:55

favo🔗,

I am only going by what Karl literally wrote. Karl writing “i.e.” implies that he was giving an example of what to say to Chex in the dispute.

Even if you are right that he didn’t mean it that way, some people might have interpreted his comment like I did and decided to write that in their future disputes.

I have seen other people on here suggest lying to Chex even more blatantly than that. I am just not a fan of liars!

Karl
Karl (@guest_2030156)
March 24, 2025 14:57

I.e. means “that is,” i.e. further explanation. “For example” would be “e.g.”

E.g., what I wrote was an explanation, not an example.

You wrote “Karl implies” when you meant “I, Eric, infer.” Your inference was based on conflating “i.e.” with “e.g.”

At least that’s what I infer.

Eric 🔗
Eric 🔗 (@guest_2030162)
March 24, 2025 15:00

I always thought that “i.e.” stood for “indicated example” until I looked it up after making my comment. I was hoping that you wouldn’t catch that. You somewhat got me there. 😉

Karl
Karl (@guest_2030133)
March 24, 2025 14:27

I really was suggesting you dispute those 2 inquiries with Chex, if they are still there, by using that logical flaw and including a direct quote from Blaze’s denial. It worked for me!

My recon with Midland failed but I got the inquiry deleted. Removal took 30 days. I disputed directly with Chex, not Midland.

“The FI claimed authorization by me from person whose ID was unknown to them” or some such. The email they sent is your proof.

Karl
Karl (@guest_2030143)
March 24, 2025 14:40

“I cannot possibly have authorized the inquiry if it wasn’t me who submitted the application” is indisputably true. Either:

  1. They knew who submitted the application, or
  2. They didn’t know who submitted the application.

It’s blatantly obvious those statements are mutually contradictory.

Also the pun was intentional.

Eric 🔗
Eric 🔗 (@guest_2030153)
March 24, 2025 14:52

#1. I appreciate you confirming that I was correct and favo🔗 was incorrect on what you meant initially. 😀

#2. I am glad that it apparently bothers you to be called a “liar” enough that you would come up with that kind of “out there” explanation to “prove” that you didn’t lie.

#3. Are you a lawyer?

RDH
RDH (@guest_2010938)
February 24, 2025 10:36

I did this last year and had a hard pull.

David
David (@guest_2008080)
February 19, 2025 20:04

Thank you for submitting your application. A Blaze Representative will contact you once your application has been reviewed

anyone got the above message been contacted?

Four
Four (@guest_2008547)
February 20, 2025 10:50

Still waiting personally. No confirmation email or anything

Roy
Roy (@guest_2014013)
February 28, 2025 15:39

They asked me to unfreeze Transunion for a soft pull a couple of days after I applied, but it eventually took a couple of weeks for my application to get approved.

S
S (@guest_2014032)
February 28, 2025 16:33

were you in-footprint or oos, and what were your chex counts at the time you applied?

Roy
Roy (@guest_2016200)
March 4, 2025 11:47
  S

I don’t keep track of my chex counts since it’s pretty high, not in footprint.

Roy
Roy (@guest_2016203)
March 4, 2025 11:48

I was in MN a long time ago though, not sure if that helped

ZH
ZH (@guest_2007291)
February 18, 2025 18:53

Does this work for OOS and is it hard pull? DPs are for 2024 and wanted to check for 2025.

Steve
Steve (@guest_2007013)
February 18, 2025 14:43

Approved and the $200 bonus was instantly added to my account. No debit card transactions and no auto payments/dd set up. The only thing I did was fund it with a credit card. Might be the easiest bonus ever achieved.

S
S (@guest_2007023)
February 18, 2025 14:56

Remember to meet the bonus terms though, otherwise they can claw back the bonus

Eric 🔗
Eric 🔗 (@guest_2007051)
February 18, 2025 15:31

Steve,

What were your Chex stats before applying?

Also, S is correct. See my comment for more info: #1818985 .

Steve
Steve (@guest_2007180)
February 18, 2025 17:23

Chex stats are high but don’t know exact numbers. P2 is equally high but was rejected.

MikeSauce
MikeSauce (@guest_2006121)
February 17, 2025 11:48

Thank you for submitting your application Michael. A Blaze Representative will contact you once your application has been reviewed.

Had a checking with them that was closed December 2023, have done a bonus with them multiple times in the past.

Pkort
Pkort (@guest_2006012)
February 17, 2025 09:48

Says I need a “Share Savings” account with a $10 fee as a required product – did others sign up for this too or find a way around it?

Eric 🔗
Eric 🔗 (@guest_2006431)
February 17, 2025 18:40

A “Share Savings” is a requirement for most, if not all, CUs. If it makes you feel any better, that $10 makes you a part owner of the CU!

George
George (@guest_2005999)
February 17, 2025 09:15

If you’re in Minnesota, you can stack this with their St Paul Saints checking product and get the cash bonus plus two free tickets to the St Paul Saints (triple A affiliate of the Minnesota Twins). You may need to do this in branch.

S
S (@guest_2005942)
February 17, 2025 02:46

Weird question on the app, have you had a checking account at this or any other financial institution in the last 12 months, if you put yes they ask you where.

Bank Bonus Bodhisattva
Bank Bonus Bodhisattva (@guest_2005847)
February 16, 2025 21:26

Thank you for submitting your application. A Blaze Representative will contact you once your application has been reviewed. For reference, your application number is

[oos]

Bank Bonus Bodhisattva
Bank Bonus Bodhisattva (@guest_2006665)
February 18, 2025 07:14

Thank you for applying for membership with Blaze Credit Union.

Unfortunately, your request has been declined due to excessive credit inquiries recently.